Drawing for JUDO

USPTO serial 77902595

JUDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Reilly

PAUL J. REILLY BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communications devices featuring voice, data and image transmission, including, voice and text messaging, video and picturing messaging, instant messaging, Internet access, and the ability to stream and download software applications, music and music videos, access to navigation and directional services over the air, and video and still image cameraACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance