Drawing for UPOFLOOR

USPTO serial 77902878

UPOFLOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UPOFLOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Atkins

ELIZABETH ATKINS Lathrop & Gage LLP230 Park AvenueSuite 2400New York, NY 10169-1304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Floor coverings based on thermoplastic polymers for use in public premises subjected to hard wear, namely, schools, hospitals, shops, offices, day care centers, retirement homes, warehouses, department stores, maritime applications; floor coverings, namely, resilient sheet flooring based on thermoplastic polymers, delivered in rolls, permanently glued to the subfloor, for use in public premises subjected to hard wear, namely, schools, hospitals, shops, offices, day care centers, retirement homes, warehouses, department stores, maritime applications; floor coverings based on wooden materials, for use in public premises subjected to hard wear, namely, schools, hospitals, shops, offices, day care centers, retirement homes, warehouses, department stores, maritime applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 7, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 25, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance