USPTO serial 77903296
CC LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2013
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CC LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thirsk, North Yorkshire, GB
Thirsk, North Yorkshire, GB
Thirsk, North Yorkshire, GB
CARLISLE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidman
MARK TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLERSTE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Trousers, overcoats, jackets, gloves, shirts, pullovers, cardigans, tee-shirts, jeans, dresses, scarves, children's clothing, namely, jackets, shirts, trousers, blouses, skirts, footwear, headgear, namely, hats; belts; jumpers; blouses; shawls; tank tops; tunics; gloves; belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Country Casuals Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Country Casuals Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Country Casuals Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BORDER I.P. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CC LONDON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 24, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |