USPTO serial 77904372
MUSIK UNIVERSITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSIK UNIVERSITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Ward
po box 32225detroit, MI 48232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital materials, namely, CDs,DVDs, and downloadable audio files featuring document files containing educational information in the field of music industry practices; Digital media, namely, CDs, DVDs, and downloadable audio files featuring document files containing educational information in the field of music industry practices; Plastic and cardboard cases for storing record albums; Pre-recorded CDs featuring document files containing educational information in the field of music industry practices; Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring document files containing educational information in the field of music industry practices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ward, Kimberly L
- Other trademarks owned by Ward, Kimberly L
- Other trademarks owned by M.U.S.I.K.
- Other trademarks owned by M.U.S.I.K.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MUSIK UNIVERSITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |