Drawing for MINDLESS MARGIN

USPTO serial 77905177

MINDLESS MARGIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDLESS MARGIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Muldoon

JAMES R. MULDOON Harris Beach PLLC300 South State StreetOne Park PlaceSyracuse, NY 13202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Wristbands, hats, caps, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, belts, ties, warm-up suitsACTIVE—
041Training services in the field of eating behavior, weight reduction, weight control, nutrition, and healthy lifestyleACTIVE—
044Providing information, advice, consultation, and support for weight reduction, diet planning, and nutrition counseling through behavior and habit modification in the fields of eating behavior, weight reduction, weight control, nutrition, and healthy lifestyleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 8, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance