Drawing for COUNTER THREAT PLATFORM

USPTO serial 77905255

COUNTER THREAT PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COUNTER THREAT PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abigail A. Rubinstein

ABIGAIL A RUBINSTEIN STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP1330 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use as an analytical tool for assessing and protecting computer networks, network connected devices, namely, computers, telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), electronic handheld units for the wireless transmission of data and/or voice signals, and GPS navigation devices, and computer software programs against attack, intrusion and misuseACTIVE—
042Computer consultation in the field of computer security, namely, for assessing and protecting computer networks, network connected devices, namely, computers, telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), electronic handheld units for the wireless transmission of data and/or voice signals, GPS navigation devices, and computer software programs against attack, intrusion and misuseACTIVE—
045Computer security services, namely, aggregating, managing and displaying security information, monitoring the security status of computer networks, network connected devices, namely, computers, telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), electronic handheld units for the wireless transmission of data and/or voice signals, GPS navigation devices, and computer software programs, and generating security responses based on network alerts on selected metrics or displaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 22, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 27, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 27, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 26, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 26, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance