Drawing for QUAIL

USPTO serial 77905478

QUAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Powelson

Matthew A. Powelson 321 Law, Inc.P.O. Box 911Monterey, CA 93942UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Organization of sporting competitions, namely, promoting sports competitions and/or events of others; providing facilities for business meetings, conferences, seminars, workshops, symposiums and exhibitions; golf and health club management services; night club management servicesACTIVE—
041Providing recreational, physical fitness, and sporting facilities; golf club, health club, physical fitness club services, educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops and demonstrations in the field of physical fitness and sports, namely, golf and tennisACTIVE—
043Hotel and resort lodging services; restaurant and catering services; provision of accommodation, namely, providing temporary housing accommodations; providing facilities for social meetings, conferences, seminars, symposiums and exhibitions; reservation services, namely, making reservations for others for hotel accommodations; coffee shop services; cafeterias; cocktail lounge services; bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 25, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 11, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance