CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for UNIFLEX SOLUTIONS THAT PERFORM MEDICAL PACKAGING DIVISION

USPTO serial 77905577

UNIFLEX SOLUTIONS THAT PERFORM MEDICAL PACKAGING DIVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIFLEX SOLUTIONS THAT PERFORM MEDICAL PACKAGING DIVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Greenbaum

DAVID GREENBAUM EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLPPO BOX 130NEW YORK, NY 10150-0130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical equipment, namely, plastic disposable X-ray cassette covers, plastic medical waste bags, plastic specimen handling and transport bags, pharmaceutical transport bags, and plastic respiratory set-up bags; protective plastic bags and envelopes to contain X-ray cassettes during handling; plastic containers for laboratory specimens; plastic disposable dressing bags; plastic re-closable bags for transmitting medical specimens; medical kit packaging in the nature of plastic bags and envelops use to keep instruments sterile; emesis containment bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 27, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance