Drawing for ANGELBEATZ

USPTO serial 77905598

ANGELBEATZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANGELBEATZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. S. VanLandingham III

12921 Bridger DriveGermantown, MD 20874UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video recordings featuring musicACTIVE—
035Arranging personal appearances by persons working in the field of music; On-line retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded music and video; Providing a website featuring information and links relating to the music industry, namely, promotion, marketing and business advice to musicians; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to music-related merchandise for retail purposesACTIVE—
041Composition of music for others; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of music via global communications networks; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music and video; Multimedia publishing of music; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music video production; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to musical artist websites and music performance ticket information; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of music; Provision of information relating to live performances, road shows, live stage events, theatrical performances, live music concerts and audience participation in such eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance