USPTO serial 77906060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH STREET6TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2225| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | plastic storage containers for domestic use; plastic storage containers for use within refrigerators and freezers | ACTIVE | Jan 20, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |