Drawing for FRIDGE BINZ!

USPTO serial 77906060

FRIDGE BINZ!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIDGE BINZ!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Peter Hochberg

D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH STREET6TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021plastic storage containers for domestic use; plastic storage containers for use within refrigerators and freezersACTIVEJan 20, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 13, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 20, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 30, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 6, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 7, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 6, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance