USPTO serial 77906737
TUCSON CUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUCSON CUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
Centennial, CO
Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
Centennial, CO
Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Centennial, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Centennial, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony P. Janik
ANTHONY P. JANIK FOX, HEFTER, SWIBEL, LEVIN & CARROLL, LLP200 W MADISON ST STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-3417UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh beef, namely, from the semimembranosus muscle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
- Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board
- Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
- Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named TUCSON CUT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |