Drawing for YOUR PATHWAY TO SUCCESS

USPTO serial 77907213

YOUR PATHWAY TO SUCCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUR PATHWAY TO SUCCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ

STEPHEN T. SCHERRER SCHERRER PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW, P.C.17 E. CRYSTAL LAKE AVE.CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Estate planning; Financial planning; Financial planning for retirement; Insurance information and consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 10, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 9, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 9, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance