Drawing for SECURPAYCARD

USPTO serial 77907441

SECURPAYCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4007707Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2011
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURPAYCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt K. Harris

COURTNEY GOLDSWORTHY WITT & GOLDSWORTHY PLLC1624 MARKET STREETSUITE 202DENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded debit cardsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 4, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2013CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 28, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2012PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 20, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 13, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2010AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Aug 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance