USPTO serial 77907549
BETHANOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETHANOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Howard
REBECCA HOWARD SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC.410 S SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409-2012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains, namely, vegetable seeds; fresh fruits and vegetables; agricultural seeds, live seedlings, live natural plants; field crops and field seeds, namely, sugar beet and sugar beet seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Advice and technical consultation in the field of production of biofuel in the form of ethyl alcohol from field crops | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical assistance in the fields of computer development for others and development of computer programs and software in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, viniculture, arboriculture, market-gardening, fruit growing, growing and protection of seeds and animal nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Syngenta Participations AG
- Other trademarks owned by Syngenta Participations AG
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BETHANOL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |