Drawing for DOUBLE ACTION

USPTO serial 77907930

DOUBLE ACTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE ACTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter H. Ajemian

PETER H AJEMIAN GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 400NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169-5956UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Gaming tables, namely, roulette tables and roulette wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 16, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 16, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 2, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 6, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 2, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 2, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 2, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 9, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jan 13, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance