Drawing for MY HOTEL SOURCE

USPTO serial 77908293

MY HOTEL SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY HOTEL SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven T. Lawrence

4647 North 32nd StreetPhoenix, AZ 85018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a web site featuring technology that enables insurance companies to book hotels for policy holders displaced by a covered event by using customized on-line user accountsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 26, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 26, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 26, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance