USPTO serial 77908876
BLACK BOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK BOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Weissman
JOSEPH J WEISSMAN JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS LLP403 E MADISON STSTE 400TAMPA, FL 33602-4614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for keeping track of online companions and organizing online communications, correspondence history, events, profiles and preferences in the field of online relationships and dating | ACTIVE | May 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |