USPTO serial 77909623
COUCH MOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUCH MOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry J. Parker
BARRY J PARKER CARR MCCLELLAN INGERSOLL THOMPSON & HORN216 PARK ROADBURLIGAME, CA 94010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer cursor control devices, namely, computer mouse; Computer cursor control devices, namely, touch pads; Computer keyboard controllers; Computer mouse; Computer mouse, namely, touchpads; Computer peripheral apparatus; Computer peripheral devices; Computer peripheral equipment; Computer peripherals; Computer peripherals and parts thereof; Remote controls for TVS, SET TOP BOX, COMPUTER, A/V EQUIPMENT; Remote cursor controls for computers; Wireless computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |