Drawing for CALLULA LILLIBELLE

USPTO serial 77909807

CALLULA LILLIBELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALLULA LILLIBELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.

ROBERT M O'CONNELL JR GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PLACE53 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Towels that may be worn as a dress or similar garmentPARTIALLY PAID—
025Dresses; Skirts; SlacksPARTIALLY PAID—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 26, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 26, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 30, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 25, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 29, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 22, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 25, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 13, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Apr 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance