Drawing for CHEFGOODY

USPTO serial 77909811

CHEFGOODY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEFGOODY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380) Birch, Stewart, Kolasch, & Birch, LLPP.O. BOX 747Falls Church, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning supplies, namely, carpet cleaners, upholstery cleaners, and glass cleanersACTIVE—
021Kitchen wares, namely, kitchen ladles, chopping boards for kitchen use, cups, and platesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2011PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Feb 8, 2011ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 6, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 30, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance