Drawing for VERONA SERIES

USPTO serial 77909828

VERONA SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERONA SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW A. NEWBOLES

MATTHEW A NEWBOLES STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESUITE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Plumbing and shower fixtures, namely, faucets, shower heads, rests for shower heads, hand showers, thermostatic control valves for showers, and shower mixersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 21, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 21, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 2011RMDTEXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB—
May 23, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 23, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance