Drawing for HALLMARK BUSINESS CONNECTIONS

USPTO serial 77910025

HALLMARK BUSINESS CONNECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HALLMARK BUSINESS CONNECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David N. Johnson

David N. Johnson Hallmark Cards, Incorporated2501 McGeeLegal Division, Mail Drop #339Kansas City, MO 64108-2600

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consulting services in the field of incentive award programs to promote customer acquisition and retention; business consulting services in the field of incentive award programs to recognize exemplary employee performance, recognition and service milestones; conducting employee recognition programs to recognize exemplary employee performance and service milestones; business management and consultation in the field of employee, customer and consumer health and wellness programs to improve and reward the enrollment and participation in health and wellness initiatives; promoting by telephone, facsimile, mail, electronic mail, or the world wide web the goods and services of others through the distribution of actual and virtual gift certificates, gift cards, debit cards, stored value cards, electronic greeting cards, and mobile greetings to employees to reward loyalty, performance, sales or other achievements or events, or to customers or consumers to promote particular products, services, brands or companies; and gift card services, namely, issuing gift cards, gift certificates and debit cards that may be redeemed for goods or servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance