USPTO serial 77910108
KUBBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KUBBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
TODD A. DENYS PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C.29 THANET RD STE 201PRINCETON, NJ 08540-3661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DEVELOPMENT AND CREATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ASSISTANCE, CONSULTANCY AND ADVICE ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN HEALTH AND HUMAN MEDICINE; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN HEALTH AND HUMAN MEDICINE; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON APPLICANT'S DATABASE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, INTERNET-BASED MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS PERTAINING TO ALLERGY AND ASTHMA, NAMELY, INFORMATION REGARDING TREATMENT OF ALLERGY AND ASTHMA DISEASES AND CONDITIONS AND POSSIBLE TREATMENTS AND LIKELY OUTCOMES; MAINTAINING FILES AND RECORDS IN DATABASES ON THE WEB AND MEDICAL RECORDS CONCERNING THE MEDICAL CONDITION OF INDIVIDUALS; MAINTAINING PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS AND FILES IN DATABASES ON THE WEB; PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION, CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES BY PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL EXPERTS; PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION, CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES ON MEDICINE AND HEALTH CARE BY PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL EXPERTS THROUGH THE WEB AND DATABASES; PROVIDING HEALTH CARE INFORMATION BY PHONE AND/OR INTERNET; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING PHYSICAL REHABILITATION AND MENTAL HEALTH BY PHONE AND INTERNET; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON MEDICAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, TREATMENT OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGIES; TELEMEDICINE SERVICES; MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS AND NUTRITION; ASSISTANCE, ADVICE, AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL CARE; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL CARE; HEALTH SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN HEALTH; HEALTH CARE, NAMELY, MEDICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE, NAMELY, MEDICAL SKIN CARE SERVICES, URGENT MEDICAL CARE SERVICES, DENTAL HYGIENIST SERVICES, ORAL SURGERY AND DENTAL IMPLANT SERVICES, AND DENTISTRY; PROVIDING SERVICES OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS, NAMELY, MAINTAINING THE FILES AND RECORDS CONCERNING THE CLINICAL DATA OF PATIENTS IN DATABASES ON THE WEB AND MAINTAINING PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS AND FILES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |