USPTO serial 77910521
THE BLINKUMENTARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BLINKUMENTARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting of video and audio programming over the Internet; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and television programmes provided via a video-on-demand service; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Interactive delivery of video over digital networks; Peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Video broadcasting; Video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network featuring the uploaded, posted and tagged videos of others; Video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network, namely, showing, displaying, and electronically transmitting video clips; Video broadcasting services via the Internet; Video on demand transmissions; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and movies; Video transmission over digital networks; Video-on-demand transmission services; Video-on-demand transmission services via the Internet | ABANDONED | Aug 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards, Matthew C
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards, Matthew C
- Other trademarks owned by Lamoureux, Haven G
- Other trademarks owned by Lamoureux, Haven G
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named THE BLINKUMENTARY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |