Drawing for UGLYTENANT

USPTO serial 77910652

UGLYTENANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UGLYTENANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry M. Krivisky

BARRY M. KRIVISKY BARRY M. KRIVISKY400 GARDEN CITY PLZ STE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3336UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing a real estate and finance website where real estate professionals and investors can post profiles and details of properties and information pertaining to real estate and real estate investmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance