USPTO serial 77910810
ICOOKBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICOOKBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Finestone
JASON A FINESTONE SHUKAT ARROW HAFER WEBER & HERBSMAN LLP111 W 57TH ST STE 1120NEW YORK, NY 10019-2227UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable electronic device for receiving and reading text and images through wireless internet access and/or digital download and for displaying electronically published materials, namely, recipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |