USPTO serial 77910862
LA RIOJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA RIOJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry D. Haynes
JERRY D HAYNES LAW OFFICE OF JERRY D HAYNES PA12550 BISCAYNE BOULEVARDSUITE 800MIAMI, FL 33181-2545Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit; Canned fruits; Canned or bottled fruits; Canned tomatoes; Canola oil; Cods; Cooking oil; Dried beans; Dried figs; Dried fruits; Fig and date roll consisting of dried fruits, nuts, and spices; Garlic-based spread; Jellies and jams; Jellies for food; Jellies, jams; Pickles; Processed artichokes; Processed asparagus; Processed beans; Processed garlic; Tuna fish | ABANDONED | Jan 3, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |