USPTO serial 77911063
MESHICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MESHICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY A. BONDELL
JAY A. BONDELL Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages excluding beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |