USPTO serial 77911127
MAXLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Baio
ELIZABETH BAIO NIXON PEABODY LLP300 S RIVERSIDE PLZFL 16CHICAGO, IL 60606-6613Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pixel circuits for active matrix organic light emitting displays (AMOLEDs), namely, electric circuits on backplanes for providing an accurate and constant drive current for light emitting devices on each pixel of a display; driver circuits and driving algorithms, namely, electronic driver circuits for a display system incorporating driving algorithms to program and drive each pixel circuit of a display; electronic apparatus, namely, thin film transistor (TFT) backplanes which use amorphous silicon, polysilicon, microcrystalline silicon, nanocrystalline silicon, metal oxide, or organic materials to form the TFT backplanes; and displays, namely, active matrix organic light emitting displays (AMOLEDs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Systems designs for active matrix organic light emitting displays (AMOLED), namely, pixel circuit design and layout, design and implementation of driving electronics and driving algorithms for a display system to program and drive each pixel circuit of a display, design and layout of thin film transistor (TFT) backplanes which use amorphous silicon, polysilicon, microcrystalline silicon, nanocrystalline silicon, metal oxide, or organic materials to form the TFT backplane | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |