USPTO serial 77911139
LAPROSURGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAPROSURGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford S. Goldfarb
CLIFFORD S. GOLDFARB GARDINER ROBERTS LLP40 KING ST. W.SCOTIA PLAZA, SUITE 3100TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Laparoscopic surgical instruments; Single-use devices for laparoscopic applications, namely, tissue retrieval systems; medical surgical instruments, namely, trocar and cannula sets, smoke filters, scissors, insufflation needles; laparoscopic surgical accessories, namely, anti-fog solution, camera sleeves, monopolar electrodes and cables, insufflation tubing, aspiration cannula; Forceps for medical use, namely, bi-polar forceps and cutting forceps; Surgical devices, namely, multi-fire clip appliers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |