Drawing for IRIIS OPTICELL

USPTO serial 77911159

IRIIS OPTICELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRIIS OPTICELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Kertz

Mark Kertz Covidien15 Hampshire StreetMansfield, MA 02048UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Minimally invasive vascular devices, namely, temporary non-electronic neurovascular devices for the treatment of cranial blood clotsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 29, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance