USPTO serial 77911817
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L.S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
12921 BRIDGER DRIVEGERMANTOWN, MD 20874UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Agriculture - Brooding, Egg Milk production Warehousing - Shipping/Receiving Areas- Zone Heating Commercial/Industrial - Manufacturing, Factories, Loading Docks Marine - Boats, Yachts, Ships, Docks, Tankers etc Automotive - Garages, Service Bays, Dealerships, Truck Terminals Entertainment -Sports Venues, Ice Rinks, Concerts, Golf Clubs,Ranges Construction - Residential, Industrial, Commercial- Housing Starts Residential/Home/Cottage- Workshops, Patios, Pool/Hot tub Areas Hotel /Hospitality - Large Conference rooms, Conferences Catering/Events Industry - Weddings, Events, Tents etc Contractors - Electrical, Heating, Air Conditioning, Plumbing, Restaurant - Outdoor Patios, Fast Food Drive Throughs, Alcoves Rent- All Companies- Commercial/Industrial, Consumer Healthcare - Long Term Health Care Residences, Hospitals, Clinics | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |