USPTO serial 77912443
MACHINE TRUTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACHINE TRUTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Alleman
MARK D. ALLEMAN ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BROADWAY STE 600PORTLAND, OR 97205-3335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for interconnecting, managing and operating manufacturing networks; computer hardware and software for distribution, manipulation and retrieval of manufacturing data over computer networks; computer-controlled displays, namely, displays having a touch screen, electro luminescence display, liquid crystal display, plasma display, graphical control panels; bar code scanning equipment and parts therefor; computer operating software for automation and control systems, namely, custom engineered computer software in the fields of manufacturing automation systems, statistical process control systems, and statistical quality control systems; automation and control systems, namely, electrical, mechanical and electromechanical controls; instrumentation, namely, automation controls and touch screen, electro luminescence, liquid crystal display (LCD), light-emitting diode (LED), flat panel, and plasma displays in the manufacturing industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of automation control system hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Customer support services in connection with computer hardware and software for use in interconnecting, managing and operating manufacturing networks, namely, computer network design services for others, computer consultation services, updating of computer software for others, computer system analysis and computer engineering services, namely, automation and control system analysis and design; information technology consulting services, namely, automation feasibility, audit and needs assessment services; engineering services and computer software design in the field of automation control systems; design, development, installation, configuring, calibration, testing and maintenance of automation control system software; technology supervision of installation, commissioning and maintenance of automated control system software; design, development, calibration and testing of automation control system hardware; technology supervision of installation and maintenance of automated control system hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shoplogix Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shoplogix Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MACHINE TRUTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |