Drawing for DWEGONLAND

USPTO serial 77912690

DWEGONLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DWEGONLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin J. Beran

MARTIN J. BERAN OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line video games for the global computer network, on-line computer multiplayer games for the global computer network, providing on-line virtual worlds and virtual theme parks environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure entertainment purposes, cable television and network programming and DVD programming and DVD programming, motion picture productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2011CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance