Drawing for POLLEXOGRAPH

USPTO serial 77912832

POLLEXOGRAPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLLEXOGRAPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William S. Frommer, Esq.

WILLIAM S. FROMMER, ESQ. FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010instruments and apparatus for medical diagnostic and treatment purposes for use in orthopedics and physical rehabilitation, namely, devices to measure range of motion; scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, a measuring device for use in orthopedics and physical rehabilitation to measure range of motionACTIVE—
042medical and scientific research services in the field of orthopedics and rehabilitation; providing medical testing services and information in the field of orthopedics research and physical rehabilitation researchACTIVE—
044medical services; medical consulting services in the field of orthopedics and physical rehabilitation; medical diagnostic testing, monitoring and reporting services; providing medical information, consultancy and advisory services; providing a website via a global computer network featuring information in the field of health, and medical information in the fields of orthopedics and physical rehabilitationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 22, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 2, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 2, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance