USPTO serial 77912853
NAVCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAVCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R Haarz
DAVID R HAARZ HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC11730 PLAZA AMERICA DR STE 600RESTON, VA 20190-4759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for operating navigation systems, route planners and electronic maps and digital dictionaries; software for operating satellite and GPS navigation systems; software for travel information systems for the provision and rendering of travel advice and information concerning service stations, car parks, restaurants, car dealers and other travel and transport related information; software for information management for the transport and traffic industries; software to be used for viewing electronic maps; downloadable electronic maps; software for operating route planners; software for operating electronic digital dictionaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Secured or unsecured telecommunications services, namely, transmission and delivery of digital data, light files, sound files, data, information and image signals by means of computer, cable, radio and satellite transmissions, all in particular for navigation systems, route planners, and the use of electronic maps; wireless transmission of data by means of video text, the internet, GSM and WAP; wireless transmission of digital data; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; rental of telecommunications equipment; technical consultation in connection with all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Secured and unsecured telecommunications services, namely, electronic storage of digital data, light files, sound files, data, information and image signals all in particular for navigation systems, route planners and the use of electronic maps | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation in the field of computer software design; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software which provides geographical, map image, and trip routing data obtained with the aid of a global positioning system, GPS, in order to enable third parties to come to an accurate location or orientation; development and design of navigation systems, route planners, electronic maps and digital dictionaries; computer software design; development and design of software for use with navigation systems, route planners, electronic maps and digital dictionaries; development and design of telecommunications and data communication services and networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |