USPTO serial 77913172
PAVENET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAVENET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher William Adams
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM ADAMS PATTON BOGGS LLP8484 WESTPARK DR FL 9MC LEAN, VA 22102-5117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Professional computer services, namely, virtual LAN/WAN design and implementation, application and desktop provisioning and virtualization for secure cross-domain data sharing across multiple levels of security; Computer services, namely, central configuration, remote and on-site management of applications on a physical or virtual operating system for others in a multi-user environment; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Computer systems integration services; Integration of computer systems and networks; Installation and maintenance of computer software or systems; Consulting in the field of virtualization and provisioning technologies for enterprises and businesses; Planning, design and implementation of virtualization and provisioning technologies for enterprises and businesses; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design of computer hardware, communications hardware and software and computer networks for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer networks, computer hardware and software systems for others; computer consulting services for planning, design, and analysis of information processes, systems, and business reengineering; Analysis and design of computer systems, information systems, software systems, software applications, software and hardware for others; Computer services, namely, design, deployment, implementation, integration and management for others of hardware configurations and software applications therefore; Computer services, namely, providing design, development, and management of others' information technology, computer networks and storage, software, software applications, software systems and computer hardware; Computer services, namely, maintenance of others' information technology, computer networks and storage, software, software applications, software systems and computer hardware; Information technology consultation services; Computer hardware and software consulting services; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; computer programming services; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology, such as voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |