Drawing for GRGEARHUB

USPTO serial 77913217

GRGEARHUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRGEARHUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jami A. Gekas

JAMI A. GEKAS WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 W WACKER DR STE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1228UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services, namely, promoting the gift cards of others; Promotional services, namely, promoting the goods of others by means of providing online gift cards; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; On-line layaway services for retail merchandise; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others that may be purchased on a layaway basis; Providing incentive award programs for customers and employees through the distribution of prepaid stored value cards for the purpose of promoting and rewarding loyaltyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance