USPTO serial 77913558
CHILENO BAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRIPI, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHILENO BAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
Redmond, OR
Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
Redmond, OR
Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
Redmond, OR
Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
Redmond, OR
Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Holland
Andrew P. Holland Thoits, Love, Hershberger & McLean285 Hamilton Ave., Suite 300Palo Alto, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring grocery and personal care items, books, videos, sporting goods, gift items, art, imported clothing, food, and gift items, and spa products in the nature of skin, hair, bath, and beauty care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty and hairdressing salon services, health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort, and day spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Chileno Bay Development Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CHILENO BAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |