USPTO serial 77913685
KUDDLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KUDDLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sander R. Gelsing
SANDER R. GELSING WARREN SINCLAIR LLP4911 - 51 STREET600RED DEER, ALBERTA, T4N6V4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations; hair care preparations; non-medicated skin lotions, creams and balms for prevention of diaper rashes and skin irritations; non-medicated skin lotions, creams and balms; skin soaps; shampoos; hair conditioners; hair styling preparations; sun screen and sun protection creams and lotions, skin washing preparations, namely, facial and body washes, baby wipes, dish soap and cleansers for cleaning baby bottles, baby bottle nipples, baby pacifiers, baby nursers, cups adopted for feeding babies and children | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |