USPTO serial 77915567
Q-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4246345Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2012
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Q-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
22043 Hamburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
22043 Hamburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
22043 Hamburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Lilienthal Stark
RACHEL LILIENTHAL STARK STARK & STARK PC993 LENOX DR BLDG 2LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) FLASH-BULBS FOR PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY DARKROOM LAMPS; COLOR FILTERS FOR TELEVISION AND MOTION PICTURE FILM CAMERAS; CORRECTING PHOTOGRAPHIC FILTERS; ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOGRAPHIC FILTERS; COLLAPSIBLE LIGHT DIFFUSER IN THE NATURE OF A SCREEN FOR USE WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL AND HIGH-END PHOTOGRAPHY; HIGH TEMPERATURE PHOTOGRAPHIC FILTERS; HIGH TEMPERATURE OPTICAL FILTERS; ROTATING LIGHTS FOR USE IN SIGNALING; SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, AIR FIELD BEACON LIGHTS; LUMINOUS AIR FIELD SAFETY BEACONS; OPTICAL LANTERNS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2007 |
| 010 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) MEDICAL EXAMINATION LAMPS FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, ENDOSCOPY AND BOROSCOPY; SURGICAL LAMPS FOR USE IN MICROSCOPY; INTRA-ORAL DENTAL LIGHT SYSTEM; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) DEVICES FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT REPLACEMENT OF STANDARD TUNGSTEN FILAMENT LIGHTING INCORPORATED INTO HAND-HELD MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, FOR SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND VETERINARY PURPOSES; QUARTZ LAMPS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; ULTRAVIOLET RAY LAMPS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; INFRARED MEDICAL EXAMINATION LAMPS; STERILIZATION UNITS, IN THE NATURE OF UV LAMPS, FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; UV LAMPS FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 19, 2007 |
| 011 | (Based on 44(e)) COLOR FILTERS FOR USE IN LIGHTING INSTRUMENTS; COLOR FILTERS, IN THE FORM OF FOILS, FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, VIDEO AND PERFORMING ARTS LIGHTING; CORRECTING FILTERS, IN THE FORM OF FOILS, FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, VIDEO AND PERFORMING ARTS LIGHTING; ELECTRIC LAMPS FOR LIGHTING; ARC LAMPS; GAS LAMPS; HALOGEN LAMPS OF LOW, MEDIUM OR HIGH VOLTAGE; LABORATORY LAMPS; PROJECTOR LAMPS; ULTRAVIOLET RAY LAMPS, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; SAFETY LAMPS FOR UNDERGROUND USE; LUMINOUS LIGHTING TUBES; ELECTRIC DISCHARGE LIGHTING TUBES; LED (LIGHT EMITTING DIODE) LIGHTING FIXTURES; COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMPS; FLUORESCENT LAMPS; DISCHARGE LAMPS; AIR FIELD LAMPS; LAMPS FOR STAGE, FILM, TELEVISION, SHOW AND EFFECTS LIGHTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Multi-Lite Lichttechnik Handels GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named Q-MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TPOA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE FOR LATE ROA RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 1966 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |