Drawing for KARCH KOURT

USPTO serial 77915735

KARCH KOURT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KARCH KOURT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark E. Avsec

MARK E. AVSEC BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP200 PUBLIC SQ STE 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Volleyball sand court systems comprised of volleyball standards and safety padding, nets, boundary lines, removable standard supports and sandACTIVEApr 22, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 8, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 8, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 14, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 14, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance