USPTO serial 77916994
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
JAMES L. SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | navigation apparatus for vehicles; global positioning systems (GPS) consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; electronic map display panels for assistance in the navigation of vehicles; satellites; black box system for visual logging of vehicle accidents; CMMB(China Mobile Multimedia Broadcasting) system, namely mixed satellite wireless broadcasting system for providing audio, video and data service for receivers with LCD display; parking assistance systems for vehicles composed of detectors for locating goods and persons around the vehicle; tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS); cameras; in-vehicle entertainment systems, namely, video display units, video tape players, television receivers, compact disc drives, CD-ROM drives, digital video disc drives, am tuner, fm tuner, automotive audio speakers, microphones, amplifiers, audio cassette deck, multimedia sound computer chips, MP3 Player, MP3 read only memory drive, and remote control units for controlling the in-vehicle entertainment system components; anti-theft warning apparatus, namely, burglar alarms for motor vehicles; warning apparatus for giving visual and sound warning to drivers of land vehicles, in case of over speed, in case of overtime driving and in case of malfunctions of land vehicles; electronic system in the nature of camera and vision module for providing assistance while driving; mobile multimedia system, namely digital multimedia apparatus for audio, video and multimedia content streaming and for transferring, transmitting, receiving, processing and digitizing images; telematic systems with applications for vehicles comprising telematics apparatus, namely, wireless Internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; vehicle on-board computer hardware and software for automotive application for use in operating and controlling entertainment systems, communication systems, Internet access and navigation; recorded computer software and programs for navigation for vehicles; downloadable computer software and programs for navigation for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |