USPTO serial 77917458
TRI ELEMENT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRI ELEMENT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonas M. Grant
JONAS M. GRANT LAW OFFICE OF JONAS M. GRANT, A.P.C.20700 VENTURA BLVD.SUITE 328WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Articulating arms and grasping systems, namely, robotic arms and hands for use by autonomous, semi-autonomous, and remote controlled land, subterranean, amphibious, and submersible military and industrial robots, for use in military applications, law enforcement operations, firefighting, and search and rescue, all for industrial use; structural parts for military, law enforcement, and industrial robots for use in the fields of interior or exterior building surveillance, military and law enforcement operations, scientific research, firefighting, and search and rescue, all for industrial use; autonomous, semi-autonomous, and remote controlled machines and components for use in military applications, law enforcement operations, firefighting, search and rescue, and scientific research, namely, industrial robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic wired and wireless controllers and circuitry, in the nature of circuit boards, electronic circuits, and electronic communication circuits, all for the control of industrial, military, and law enforcement robots; apparatus in the nature of stand-alone and integrated, single and multi-board computers, microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor (DSP), and field programmable gate array (FPGA) based motion controllers, and integrated robot controllers consisting of electrical, electronic components, and electronic communication circuits, and computers, all for industrial, military, and law enforcement robots; enclosures in the nature of plastic and metal boxes for housing electronic circuitry, connector housings, electric switch housings, and housings for robotic controllers, all for military, law enforcement, and industrial robots for use in the fields of interior or exterior building surveillance, military or law enforcement operations, scientific research, firefighting, and search and rescue; electrical and mechanical parts and fittings in the nature of electrical cables, wires, conductors, and metal and plastic connectors; electrical, electronic, and electromechanical circuits and devices in the nature of transducers and sensors for detecting movement, position, telemetry, velocity, orientation, presence or absence of chemicals or radioactive material, sound, visible or invisible light, and magnetic or electromagnetic radiation, for military, law enforcement, and industrial robots, for use in the fields of interior or exterior building surveillance, military or law enforcement operations, scientific research, firefighting, and search and rescue; computer software, for control of autonomous, semi-autonomous, and remote-controlled industrial, military, and law enforcement robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Autonomous, semi-autonomous, and remote controlled machines and components for use in military applications, law enforcement operations, firefighting, search and rescue, and scientific research, namely, unmanned land, subterranean, aerial, amphibious, and submersible vehicles, unmanned land and amphibious cargo and injured personnel transport vehicles; unmanned land, aerial, amphibious, and submersible surveillance vehicles; unmanned land explosive ordinance detection, neutralization, and disposal vehicles, and unmanned amphibious and submersible mine detection, neutralization, and disposal vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research pertaining to robotic systems, autonomous and semi-autonomous unmanned systems, namely, unmanned vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned land vehicles, unmanned amphibious vehicles, unmanned submersible vehicles, and networked robotics used in command, control, communications, and computers information system; scientific research pertaining to the use of robotics in industrial surveillance and monitoring, military and defense systems and technologies, Homeland security and defense, law enforcement, search and rescue, and firefighting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tri Element Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tri Element Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRI ELEMENT SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |