USPTO serial 77918418
DEAUVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEAUVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
14800 Deauville, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Richmond
MICHAEL T. RICHMOND KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLPMAIN STFL 14IRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumes, cosmetics, lipsticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles and structural parts therefor; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, cars and motorcycles and structural parts therefore; motors for land vehicles; bodies for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments; jewel cases of precious metal; watch bands, watch chains, watch springs, watch glasses; key rings of precious metal; cases for watches, cases for clocks and watchmaking; medals | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather; animal skins; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips and saddlery; pocket wallets; purses; hand bags, rucksacks, wheeled shopping bags, travelling bags, beach bags, vanity cases; bags of leather for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, over-blouse and swimming suits; gloves; scarves; neckties; beach shoes, boots for sports; underwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, production and diffusion of cinematographic documents; organizing community sporting and cultural events; entertainment information; information on education; providing recreation services in the nature of organized commented visits and walks, pools and spa centers, horseback riding facilities, tennis and golf courses, gastronomic activities; publication of books; organization of sports competitions; educational services, namely, providing seminars and conferences in the field of business start-up assistance; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; booking of seats for shows; providing on-line non-downloadable publications in the nature of books and journals in the field of the history and cultural identity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMUNE DE DEAUVILLE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DEAUVILLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |