USPTO serial 77918571
UKNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UKNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Aker
DAVID AKER DAVID AKER, ATTORNEY AT LAW23 SOUTHERN RDHARTSDALE, NY 10530-2128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for reading unstructured text on WebPages and URLs for purposes of conceptual targeting of page level meaning of content; Computer software for reading unstructured text on WebPages and URLs for purposes of achieving webpage-level categorization or content classification, which can be used to advise on the selection and serving of the most relevant graphical advertisement; computer software for allowing web publishers to automatically categorize or classify their WebPages, based upon custom-designed parent and child level categories, to increase their gross sales price through better contextualization; computer software for categorizing relevance based upon webpage-level content; computer software for allowing advertisers to define the content and environment they desire as best associated with a their brand for purposes of increasing brand lift, and increasing click through metrics; computer software for automatically categorizing or classifying advertising based WebPages and URLs so as to avoid negative branding situations; computer software for monitoring advertisements to ensure graphical brand advertisement is not served in a compromising or negative content situation; computer servers containing computer software for reading unstructured text on WebPages and URLs for purposes of conceptual targeting of page level meaning of content; computer servers containing computer software for reading unstructured text on WebPages and URLs; computer servers containing computer software for achieving webpage-level categorization or content classification, which can be used to advise on the selection and serving of the most relevant graphical advertisement; computer servers containing computer software that allows web publishers to automatically categorize or classify their WebPages, based upon custom-designed parent and child level categories, to increase their gross sales price through better contextualization; computer servers containing computer software for categorizing relevance based upon webpage-level content; a computer system comprised of computers, interfaces for computers and computer software for allowing advertisers to define the content and environment they desire as best associated with a their brand, to increase brand lift, and increase click through metrics; computer servers containing computer software for avoiding negative branding situations by ensuring graphical brand advertisement is not served in a compromising or negative content situation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | managing web site data for others, namely, providing automated webpage-level categorization, based upon contextualization of page using "conceptual-targeting" brand building blueprints, to businesses, namely, digital (web) publishers, intermediaries such as ad networks, optimizers, demand side platforms, and real-time auction based bidding markets for graphical advertising and advertising agencies, as well as advertisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of technology solution including software to achieve highest relevance or best matched category based upon Webpage/URL level content. Licensing of technology solution to achieve highest relevance or best matched category based upon Webpage/URL level content by allowing web publishers to notify market participants, such as advertisers, through various means such as ad networks, optimizers, demand side platforms, and real-time bidding auctions, of the context of a webpage where graphical display advertisement inventory is for sale. Licensing of technology solution to inform the graphical advertising purchaser of the page-level content where their advertisement would be served, should they purchase the inventory offered by web publishers or intermediary. Licensing of technology solution to businesses including software to achieve highest relevance or best matched category based upon Webpage/URL level content. Licensing of technology solution to businesses to achieve highest relevance or best matched category based upon Webpage/URL level content by allowing web publishers to notify market participants, such as advertisers, through various means such as ad networks, optimizers, demand side platforms, and real-time bidding auctions, of the context of a webpage where graphical display advertisement inventory is for sale. Licensing of technology solution to businesses to inform the graphical advertising purchaser of the page-level content where their advertisement would be served, should they purchase the inventory offered by web publishers or intermediary | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Litmus Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Litmus Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named UKNOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |