USPTO serial 77918671
WINGU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINGU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAMBRIDGE, MA
CAMBRIDGE, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTOFER E. ELBING
KRISTOFER E ELBING187 PELHAM ISLAND ROADWAYLAND, MA 01778UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer software for application and database integration; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; Enterprise software in the nature of a database for non-transactional data and a search engine for database content (Based on Intent to Use) Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information; Computer software for scientific analysis of genetic sequences; Computer software that assists computers in deploying parallel applications and performing parallel computations | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2009 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for allowing data retrieval, upload, access and management; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in building software applications; Cloud computing featuring software for use in scientific discovery and drug development; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Development of software for secure network operations; Hosting the software, websites and other computer applications of others on a virtual private server; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of scientific discovery and drug development; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in scientific discovery and drug development; Software development and product development in the field of scientific discovery and drug development (Based on Intent to Use) Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Application service provider featuring software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, researching, analyzing, reporting, and maintaining applications, software, web sites, and databases of others in the fields of healthcare, benefits programs, employee productivity, risk management; Computer services, namely, providing a web-based system and online portal for customers to remotely manage, administer, modify and control their end user computer devices, data and software applications; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |