USPTO serial 77919347
KLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Aerials; antennas; portable radio communication machines and apparatus, namely, portable radios; multichannel radio communication machines and apparatus for fixed stations, namely, radios; telecommunication devices and apparatus, namely, mobile and cellular telephones and handsets; radio communication machines and apparatus, namely, radio receivers and transmitters; wire communication machines and apparatus, namely, automatic switching machines; broadband wireless equipment, namely, telecommunications base station equipment for cellular and fixed networking and communications applications; base station for wireless communication in the nature of wireless transmitters, receivers and controllers; base station repeaters for wireless communication systems; base station controllers for wireless communication comprised of switching, embedding computer and peripheral hardware and software for system operation; repeating exchange machines, namely, telephones, mobile phones, computer hardware, namely, wireless network repeaters; repeater for wireless communication in the nature of wireless transmitters, receivers and controllers; mobile communication systems, namely, long term evolution (LTE) systems, consisting of a base station system comprised of base station controllers and base transceiver stations; walkie-talkies; mobile phones; portable telephones; cellular telephone apparatuses; cellular telephones; mobile telephones; parts and accessories for telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, antennas, connection cables, remote controls for radios or radio telephones; telephone sets; telephone transmitters; telephone terminal; telephone terminals; telephone apparatus; computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; devices for wireless radio transmission; terminals for radiotelephones; wireless telephony apparatus; modems; computer utility programs; computer software for drivers for network interface cards and devices, namely, software encoded on a CD-ROM and on a hardware memory such as a flash chip, and software downloadable from the internet, for use in relation to network connectivity; computer hardware and computer software for wireless telecommunications systems for setting up, deploying, configuring, controlling, monitoring, diagnosing and managing wireless networking devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |