Drawing for HILLTOP BUTCHER SHOP

USPTO serial 77919975

HILLTOP BUTCHER SHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HILLTOP BUTCHER SHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald S. Burnham

DONALD S. BURNHAM ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC2 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 16BOSTON, MA 02110-4101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUTCHERSHOP SERVICES AND RETAIL FOOD STORE SERVICES FEATURING MEATS, BAKED GOODS, PRODUCE AND DELI GOODSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 17, 2011PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jun 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 18, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance