USPTO serial 77920442
ESECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Barnett
CHRISTOPHER BARNETT SCOTT & SCOTT LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 5000DALLAS, TX 75201-7902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of messages and data by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information network, namely, transfer of information and user defined data related to the management and monitoring of commercial and residential security and property automation systems, namely, lighting, appliances, sprinkler systems, power, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), video cameras, video monitors, smoke detectors, fire detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, flood detectors, temperature sensors, motion sensors, vibration sensors, access sensors and entry sensors | ACTIVE | Nov 10, 2007 |
| 042 | Commercial and residential property automation services by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information network, namely, remote monitoring and control of lighting, appliances, power, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), video cameras, video monitors, flood detectors, temperature sensors, access sensors, entry sensors, fire suppression sprinkler systems, smoke detectors, fire detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, motion sensors and vibration sensors | ACTIVE | Nov 10, 2007 |
| 045 | Commercial and residential property security remote monitoring services by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Nov 10, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |