Drawing for ESECURE

USPTO serial 77920442

ESECURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ESECURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Barnett

CHRISTOPHER BARNETT SCOTT & SCOTT LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 5000DALLAS, TX 75201-7902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of messages and data by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information network, namely, transfer of information and user defined data related to the management and monitoring of commercial and residential security and property automation systems, namely, lighting, appliances, sprinkler systems, power, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), video cameras, video monitors, smoke detectors, fire detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, flood detectors, temperature sensors, motion sensors, vibration sensors, access sensors and entry sensorsACTIVENov 10, 2007
042Commercial and residential property automation services by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information network, namely, remote monitoring and control of lighting, appliances, power, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), video cameras, video monitors, flood detectors, temperature sensors, access sensors, entry sensors, fire suppression sprinkler systems, smoke detectors, fire detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, motion sensors and vibration sensorsACTIVENov 10, 2007
045Commercial and residential property security remote monitoring services by means of wireless services and wireline services through a global computer information networkACTIVENov 10, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 29, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance